Hastings Police

Chat about anything local that doesn't fit elsewhere!
Watcher
Posts: 10
Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2014 3:37 pm

Hastings Police

Postby Watcher » Mon Jan 13, 2014 6:28 pm

Has anyone any information on the PCSOs who were required to resign last August over allegations of taking money from traders for favours?




Watcher
Posts: 10
Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2014 3:37 pm

Re: Hastings Police

Postby Watcher » Wed Jan 29, 2014 3:50 pm

Sussex police have stated that a 41yr old was dismissed for gross misconduct The Observer refuses to print ant thing




Olly
Posts: 126
Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2014 3:35 pm

Re: Hastings Police

Postby Olly » Thu Jan 30, 2014 9:10 am

[quoted]
watcher wrote:
Sussex police have stated that a 41yr old was dismissed for gross misconduct The Observer refuses to print ant thing
[/quoted]

Plod's probably slapped a D-notice on it. :whistle:




Watcher
Posts: 10
Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2014 3:37 pm

Re: Hastings Police

Postby Watcher » Thu Jan 30, 2014 4:00 pm

The Romney Marsh Herald has printed the story (finally) Lydd and District Cllr C Goddard has admitted that he was sacked. He was a PCSO in Hollington and Old Town areas.Any information on the misconduct would be appreciated the police are hiding the truth.




Olly
Posts: 126
Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2014 3:35 pm

Re: Hastings Police

Postby Olly » Fri Jan 31, 2014 9:11 am

[quoted]
watcher wrote:
The Romney Marsh Herald has printed the story (finally) Lydd and District Cllr C Goddard has admitted that he was sacked. He was a PCSO in Hollington and Old Town areas.Any information on the misconduct would be appreciated the police are hiding the truth.
[/quoted]

Why not ask them citing the Right to Information Act? Make 'em squirm!!




Watcher
Posts: 10
Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2014 3:37 pm

Re: Hastings Police

Postby Watcher » Fri Jan 31, 2014 9:35 am

Hastings police have already refused FOI request They hide behind DATA Protection Act. Surely some of the Old Town traders know what was Allegedly going on?




Olly
Posts: 126
Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2014 3:35 pm

Re: Hastings Police

Postby Olly » Fri Jan 31, 2014 10:01 am

[quoted]
watcher wrote:
Hastings police have already refused FOI request They hide behind DATA Protection Act. Surely some of the Old Town traders know what was Allegedly going on?
[/quoted]

They probably do but are wisely keeping schtum - their livelihoods depend on it. What a sick joke the FOI has turned out to be! 'Ask whatever you like and we'll decide how much to tell you.' Come the revolution bruvvers!





User avatar
Gerry Glyde
Posts: 452
Joined: Sat Nov 21, 2009 10:56 am

Re: Hastings Police

Postby Gerry Glyde » Fri Jan 31, 2014 2:41 pm

Like all legislation there are rules, regulations and definitions. As this was a dismissal and was not seemingly a criminal prosecution and it is a personnel and personal, employment matter it would not as such be subject to automatic FOI. I expect that most people would object to their personal employment files being subject to general perusal.

A refusal to disclose under FOI is subject to appeal to the Information Commissioner who will investigate.




Watcher
Posts: 10
Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2014 3:37 pm

Re: Hastings Police

Postby Watcher » Fri Jan 31, 2014 3:48 pm

No one in an ordinary job wants their private business published but a public servant, a councillor , and PCSO should be beyond reproach.




Olly
Posts: 126
Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2014 3:35 pm

Re: Hastings Police

Postby Olly » Sat Feb 01, 2014 9:02 am

[quoted]
watcher wrote:
No one in an ordinary job wants their private business published but a public servant, a councillor , and PCSO [color:red]should be beyond reproach.[/color][/quoted]

And fully accountable to the public, their paymasters? They often think of themselves as our masters rather than what they really are - our servants. And that includes politicians. God how I loathe politicians!!






Return to “General Hastings Chat & Friendly Banter”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 39 guests