[quoted]
Mymblesdaughter wrote:Here's a interesting article on the Jerwood
http://www.guardian.co.uk/artanddesign/ ... ade-reviewI like the Jerwood and am looking forward to it opening. Having lived in Cornwall when they built the Tate in St Ives, it certainly made a difference to the image of Cornwall and increased the amount of visitors. It's now a busy destination all year round. Whether you consider that a good thing I don't know.
I certainly can't see it having a negative effect on the town. I don't know of any places in Britain that have been ruined by artists maybe you can illuminate me hanpet?
[/quoted]
Interesting article, aspecially the comments!
Can't see that it's any more of an eyesore than the slabby 'eat@stade' building.
Haven't visited yet -- put off by (a) parking and (b) lack of interesting exhibitions. I fear these will put off tourists too, as well as the entry fee. However, if they can get their act together, it should be a decent tourist trap -- what else to do on a rainy day??
Please don't knock the Jerwoods -- they have done a huge amount for arts and music in this country. (Ask any aspiring opera singer!)
One thing -- would the protesters now please remove their posters? Now that the building is actually there, whether you wanted it or not, it's only polite. I feel they are an unwelcome slap in the face for visitors who won't be aware of the protests or the reasons for them.
I agree with other commenters that St Mary-in-the-Castle is a deserving subject for restoration and support, But it's a different kind of venue from the Jerwood. As for the Pier_ _ _ that's a different case again!
The trick is for us all to be patient and hope that the 'gentrification' of H/StL proceeds slowly and sensibly enough to add successive benefits to the town without spoiling the unique character which we all love and is why we live here.